Vice President Kamala Harris on Friday called on the federal government to move “as quickly as possible” to change the way it officially classifies marijuana, saying that “nobody should have to go to jail for smoking weed.”

“I cannot emphasize enough that they need to get to it as quickly as possible,” Harris said. “We need to have a resolution based on their findings and their assessment. This issue is stark when one considers the fact that on the schedule currently, marijuana is considered as dangerous as heroin ― as dangerous as heroin ― and more dangerous than fentanyl, which is absurd, not to mention patently unfair.”

Marijuana is currently listed as a Schedule 1 drug by the Drug Enforcement Administration. That classification designates it one of the most dangerous drugs possible, with no medicinal uses. Other substances in the same category include heroin, ecstasy and LSD. Marijuana advocates have been pushing for years for the federal government to either reschedule marijuana to a different category or deschedule it entirely.

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Harris oversaw more than 1,900 marijuana convictions in San Francisco, previously unreported records from the DA’s office show. Her prosecutors appear to have convicted people on marijuana charges at a higher rate than under her predecessor, based on data about marijuana arrests in the city.

    As the political winds blow with her I guess. At least it’s a positive change.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      As an AG, it was her role to uphold the law and bring forward prosecutions.

      I’m recognizing positive change, which is an option now with her new role

      Edit I’ll also acknowledge it’s an election year and this is a popular topic TOO

      • Manos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        They campaigned on this 4 years ago. They’ve done plenty of good things, but this one turned out out to be an empty promise.

        • june@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yea just ignore that Biden directed the relevant federal agencies to get this done and the HHS has already made the recommendation to move it to schedule 3.

          Oh and damn, look at this: https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahsinclair/2024/01/18/dea-considers-rescheduling-cannabis-what-this-means-for-us-and-global-reform/?sh=2ce8efef743f

          The gears are still moving and the DEA, the agency with the final say according to the legal framework within the controlled substances act, is working on it with the executive branch is actively pushing to have it reclassified.

          It’s almost like a bunch of you who are making brand new accounts to make these posts about broken campaign processes have no fucking clue what you’re talking about because, at the very least, you’re not paying any fucking attention.

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Buddy, Obama campaigned on this. So in our minds it’s been 12 years they’ve fucked around on rescheduling and legalization. 4 of those years Democrats held a majority in congress. We have every right to be furious with these corrupt pieces of shit.

            • june@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Oh fuck off.

              Don’t blame Obama’s failure on the person that wasn’t president at the time.

              Admit that there’s finally some fucking progress on this and stop being so petulant about how it hasn’t happened fast enough for your sensibilities.

              Of course it’s idiotic that this hasn’t been done yet, but good god damn it’s getting done but that’s just not good enough is it? May as well protest vote in the election and get trump back in office who, last I checked didn’t make any efforts toward this when he held the office.

              • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Admit that there’s finally some fucking progress

                THIS ISN’T FUCKING PROGRESS. NOTHING HAS CHANGED.

                You’re the one who needs to fuck off. You’re celebrating like they crossed some kind of goal line because they talked about it? And then you lecture me for pointing out it’s been talked about for at least 12 years? STOP TALKING ABOUT IT FOR A FUCKING SOUND BYTE AND FUCKING GET IT DONE.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Eh.

      That was when it went from jail to a fine though.

      So lots of people stopped giving a shit and started smoking publicly.

      And she’s been pro legalization for years now.

      There’s lots of shit to criticize Biden and Harris on, but Harris’s time as a DA and her cannabis conviction just isn’t a good one.

      • ArcRay@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Under Harris, the D.A.'s office obtained more than 1,900 convictions for marijuana offenses, including persons simultaneously convicted of marijuana offenses and more serious crimes.[73] The rate at which Harris’s office prosecuted marijuana crimes was higher than the rate under Hallinan, but the number of defendants sentenced to state prison for such offenses was substantially lower.[73] Prosecutions for low-level marijuana offenses were rare under Harris, and go her office had a policy of not pursuing jail time for marijuana possession offenses.”

        From her Wikipedia page (the reference is pay walled and im not invested enough to figure it out).

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Or this is what she wants the law to be, that was what she did when her job was to enforce the law that existed back then.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        DAs always have discretion in what cases to drop or move forward, along with being able to offer plea bargains. They aren’t legally required to prosecute everyone who smokes weed, it’s just good optics to a certain political class to do so. And that political class was a much bigger tent even 10-15 years ago.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I think if Biden and Harris were to officially endorse decriminalizing or legalizing recreational marijuana, we’d see a Democrat landslide. But that would require some actual common sense from Congressmen.

  • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    “nobody should have to go to jail for smoking weed”

    -The person who made a career putting people in jail for smoking weed

    • MDKAOD@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Harris has been pro weed for years now. One of the foremost issues with our political system in the US is that these people are elected by a constituency that demands a job be done in a way that they want. (I am purposely ignoring the corporate donor aspect for this statement)

      The locality (and the era) demanded drug dealers go to jail, so she did her job. Where Harris has floundered is how she talks about it and attonrs for it today.

      You can be outspoken about a politicians past, but it’s disingenuous to ignore that a politician has changed, especially so if they have changed with positive progression.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Except being a politician is also about image as much as we may not want it to be. Biden being the champion of student loan forgiveness while also being the champion of making student loan debt almost impossible to discharge earlier in his career doesn’t really feel all that great ya know? Same shit with Harris.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I wouldn’t call being angry at a prosecutor putting innocent people into prison blind hate exactly. Certainly I wouldn’t accept the logic that the constituency wanted to put innocent people in prison and that’s why she did it, even if I believe that I would still find that morally repugnant.

          • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I more mean that there are a lot of new accounts coming in and plastering this hate all over the place, and their reasoning is always “once a hater always a hater.” They aren’t here genuinely, or they are extremely ignorant of how humans work.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’m sorry I don’t take your meaning. In response to a comment about people disliking Kamala Harris for her record as a prosecutor, especially when she knowingly withheld evidence and secured the imprisonment of innocent suspects, you just decided to talk about how hate is bad in general? Seems odd. Don’t know why you make the comment in that exact spot if it is nothing to do at all with the topic. Kind of confusing.

              • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                I’m saying that the intentional burying of head when it comes to her slow shift to supporting it being rescheduled, is hating for the sake of hate.

                She did her job, and yeah her view was shit at the time. But she did what we all say we want people to do, and changed her tune. But somehow we still hate her?

                You can hate past actions, but she either saw the light, or saw that her views were shit and is acting against her own views in support of the will of the people. A “yeah but” thrown on top is just trying to divide.

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I’m sorry what? Where are you getting that she’s changed her tune? She isn’t up there talking about judicial reform or changing the way prosecutors work.

  • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Just so everyone knows, the DEA is actively reviewing a report from the Department of Health and Human services where they recommended to reschedule weed to a schedule 3. Biden had directed HHS to research to see if it should be rescheduled, so while biden hasn’t unilaterally legalized weed (something that would quickly be challenged in court since presidents don’t usually have unilateral power for most things), he has definitely been pushing it not be schedule 1. Which, while not legalization, would be a huge step for not just the industry but for all the medical patients out there who have had their doctors refuse to treat them because they use weed for pain.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I unironically think that if marijuana should be banned, then so should alcohol

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      If they were both first introduced today alcohol would definitely be the one people would want more restricted.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Alcohol can kill you pretty quickly if you’re not careful, IMO it probably should be more restricted than weed.

      • Zozano@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Absolutely not true.

        As soon as republicans discover it’s easier to convince underaged girls to fuck them if they’re drunk, it’s going legal.

    • Nyoka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Maybe try reading about the 1920s attempt and get back to us on if you still feel that way.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The difference is I don’t think either should be banned, really. But mainly because the bans just don’t work.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I barely touched weed my whole life until I got medical access ~5 years ago. I was also never a big drinker or user of other recreational substances.

    The stuff helps me so much that I use my vape or edibles almost every single day. That plus the margin of safety makes it downright cruel in my eyes that it’s prohibited in so many places.

    But I guess given the racist motives of the anti-marijuana push 40 years ago, maybe the cruelty was the point.

  • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Somebody ought to do something about this ASAP,” says one of the only people on the planet actually capable of doing something about it for the last 4 years. OK.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Elections are coming up so it’s time to talk about it and do nothing else that would make it happen

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Biden could order cannabis descheduled ( what his campaign program was) and if agencies don’t listen, fucking fire the agency heads and hire someone that will. It literally one of the handful of things he could do himself.

      But somehow it’s 3.5 years into his first term. And Biden has apparently compromised even more with himself and we won’t get his original compromise of descheduling.

      When a president acts like this right before their next election, lots of voters rationally stop believing any of their current campaign promises.

      • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        He attempted to forgive student debt (which was in his right to do so as head of the executive branch) and got swatted down by the corrupt Supreme Court. What do you think will happen if he rescheduled marijuana?

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The student loan forgiveness was swatted down because he technically didn’t really have the authority to do so, Congress typically holds the power of the purse. Rescheduling isn’t at risk of violating the separation of power as the DEA is under the purview of the executive.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          He waited 2 years till he lost the house, made a half assed attempt he knew would fail, then said:

          See? Trying is just a waste of time, we should never try

          And voters remember that when it’s two years later and he tries to tell them elections are important and if Trump wins suddenly the president is all powerful.

          Neoliberals do the same shit as republicans. They need their voters to believe that when the other team is president, the president is all powerful. But when their own team is in power, the president can’t do shit, so it’s not their fault campaign promises aren’t kept.

      • june@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Source for where Biden called for it to be descheduled?

        I can’t find it.

      • zigmus64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        What do you mean? This is standard political fare… most of the population has the memory of a goldfish, so popular shit like this always waits until the election cycle.

        Additionally, an executive order, or changing the chief of the DEA, are probably the least effective ways to handle it. All it would take is a republican administration to undo it all. The way that sticks best is legislation.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Your boat is leaking.

          Do you either bail out the water, or try to get into port so you can fix it.

          Or maybe, you do both. Biden can reschedule…. Today. He could have done it 3.5 years ago.

          He hasn’t. He probably won’t.

          You’re right that legislation is a more permanent fix. No question there. Doesn’t mean you don’t work the other, faster, solution to get something good enough for the time being done.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          most of the population has the memory of a goldfish, so popular shit like this always waits until the election cycle.

          Stupid uninformed people…

          Most of them vote R or not at all.

          But neoliberals refuse to acknowledge people who aren’t ignorant and do care.

          “Because what are ya gonna do, vote Republican?”

          It doesn’t work.

          Maybe we try helping people? Worst case scenario, Dems actually help people when they’re in office.

          Isn’t that the whole point of electing Dems? Isn’t that better than just stalling the Republicans destruction of our country?

          • zigmus64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I completely agree… but that’s how this shit goes. This is definitely one of the situations where both sides pull the same shenanigans. When was the last time you heard Kamala Harris open her mouth? Granted, she’s been busy in a divided Senate, but Dan Quayle was more visibly present during the elder Bush’s administration than Kamala has been during Biden’s. Now she crawls out of the Senate chambers to talk about cannabis? Better late than never I guess.

            It’s not like Biden’s administration hasn’t been doing anything useful. But these wildly popular policy initiatives that would do a lot of good often wait for politically convenient moments when it’ll be fresh in the electorate’s memory.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Which is the exact danger of running neoliberals that only care about being elected.

              The only thing making this “how shit goes” is both parties get money from the same donors who don’t want anything fixed.

              It’s not like how the sun sets everyday and there’s nothing we can do.

              So telling people “that’s the way she goes” isn’t helping and is only hurting turnout.

              • zigmus64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Ok… so how do we run people genuinely interested in fixing it? How do we make this not how shit goes? I can’t argue that it’s really disheartening, but the idea that any party is going to run anyone primarily interested in anything other than getting reelected is absurd. The National Committees for each party would never give them a platform. Running third party is suicide here.

                The real change that needs to happen is election reform to provide more transparent campaign financing and moving away from a First Past the Post voting system. That’s how you get people in who can actually fix the issues we have in a constructive and positive manner. It won’t be perfect but it would be helpful. Then we’d have a flourishing of different political parties emerge and voters would have actual choice.

                “That’s the way she goes” shouldn’t hurt turnout. The reality is we’re facing the single greatest threat to the basic ideals of the American Republican Democracy. Bigger things are afoot than cannabis policy. I’ll take this political grandstanding from the Biden administration 10 times out of 10 than one more day of a Trump administration.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Ok… so how do we run people genuinely interested in fixing it? How do we make this not how shit goes?

                  Undo citizens united would be a great first step…

                  Something that the majority of Dem voters agree with.

                  Without those donations and the obligations they come with, neoliberals would stop winning primary elections, and the ones still in office would stop having a reason to oppose progress.

                  I didn’t read anything else you typed after that, because if you didn’t understand that already, I don’t see how anything else you could have said was in any way relevant

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s honestly just insulting at this point. Deschedule the fucking plant already, you doddering old fools.

      When you’re done, we can have a frank conversation about the number of people directly killed by alcohol each year. (It’s literally infinitely more compared to marijuana.)

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lemmy sees something good happen:

      “Not good enough!”

      We all know it should have happened before, but dismissing that the vice president just publicly called for this is silly

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The words of a politician are not accomplishments.

        If it ever gets descheduled, it’ll be an accomplishment. I’m not going to treat announcements as accomplishments.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Public discourse from a sitting executive politician represents progress. It is not enough yet, but it is progress. In years past such statements would have been massively disruptive, and via speech like this the topic is being normalized.

          It’s not enough yet. We arenf done

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Stop expecting me to believe that politicians’ lies are progress just because you believe them.

            It’s not an accomplishment until it’s accomplished.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Just because you don’t understand the power of normalized discourse doesn’t mean I have some obligation to you.

              I’m just telling you how reality works.

              Edit im proud to hear more discussion of climate, LGBT, drug decrim and other issues, at increasingly public and increasingly executive levels.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                I know the difference between hot air and accomplishments. You’re not going to gaslight me into accepting the former as the latter. All you’re doing is convincing me that you prefer words to accomplishments.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  50 years ago a woman, non-white politician wouldn’t have been a common thing. Part of how we got to where we are today is via public, popularized discourse.

                  The same occurs in this article and the speech that lead to it.

                  It doesn’t mean the world is changing in an active sense, but it does mean the conversation is happening. This is part of the power of executive office.

                  I’m sorry you had to learn about this from me.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Man I think you have way too high of expectations for the actual powers of a vice presidency.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well I don’t do drugs but she could schedule it for tomorrow after breakfast. I know my neighbor smokes it after work for example. 😂.

  • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Pretty sure she put a ton of people in jail for this in Washington state. If that’s really how you feel where was the leniency then?

      • Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not sure why the downvotes but it’s true. I don’t have case specifics - just google around a bit.

        • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          In what capacity did she put people in jail in Washington state? Let’s follow this thing through to the end.

            • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              No because he’s just parroting a talking point that he’s heard here without even being accurate.

              He could at least acknowledge that her position has changed and we’re close to progress.

              • John Richard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Her positioned has changed? If you want a politician that is true to their beliefs then you elect someone like Bernie. If you’re okay with someone that will revert course again when they want to fill their pockets with more private-prison money, but at least they’re not Trump, then you go with Biden/Kamala.

                • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Or, and hear me out on this, her position truly changed.

                  I used to think billionaires were cool. Now I think they’re detrimental to society and represent a lot of what’s wrong with wealth inequality in this country. People learn, opinions change - we should welcome that.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      How many pot smokers do you think she sent to prison as a DA?

      And all those teenage “super predators” that Joe, Jack and Bill sent to prison

        • John Richard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s like the DNC hiring previous lobbyist from companies like Uber, Lyft & Airbnb to define union policies.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        And all those teenage “super predators” that Joe, Jack and Bill sent to prison

        That’s what I dont get when people criticize Harris…

        Biden literally sponsored the two crime bills back in the 90s that have caused 30 years of bullshit.

        Harris as prosecutor was very outspoken about how stupid that shit was and didn’t follow the “three felonies = life in jail” bullshit.

        If people want to talk about poor policing oractices, Biden is hands down the person most responsible in the Dem party. And all his “I can compromise with republicans” is how he got Dems to support such backwards legislation.

        Harris was a DA, she wasn’t setting national procedures and passing laws

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    You know, this is a pretty smart way to approach the political side of this tactically.

    Biden can’t say deschedule it outright without offending at least some borderline fence sitters and the elder crowd indoctrinated with the old propaganda that made it out to be among the most terrible things.

    By having the younger VP who wouldn’t really have direct authority to have it changed but is directly I’m the same circles, it gets the idea out there as a ‘very strong unofficial stance’.

    Next step, the ‘cool grandpa’ moment when Biden gets to make a gesture for the younger crowd by having it pulled from the schedules. Financially the feds have undoubtedly been eyeing the income (and lack of incarceration costs) brought into states with legal sales for a while and would like a piece of it too.

    • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      So lies and deception? I don’t know who is left to deceive when this sounds like the position the WH had two decades ago (when Biden was in Harris’s exact role). Since then the only changes have been brought about by State’s thumbing their nose at the Federal Government. I can honestly say the argument for “State’s Rights” hold more promise for marijuana legalization than Harris’s words.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Neoliberals dont want elected to help people, they want to get elected.

        It’s why they can see something like this where a president could do something day 1, but waits four years before doing it, and call it smart strategy. Even when it’s not a political.process and the president can do it on their own.

        It’s why there’s always the focus on “stopping by the republican”.

        That’s all neoliberals want to accomplish, get in office and hold on as long as they can.

        Progressives want to get elected to help people, and have faith if you help people they’ll vote for you.

        There’s no sane reason for neoliberals to be running the Dem.party on national and state levels, but it’s a private party and they get an absolute shit ton of money from billionaires and corporations. So it’s very hard to kick their old asses out of power while also fighting off conservative extremist Republicans.

        But when the neoliberals wins, nothing gets fixed. Their dogs chasing a car, if they catch it they dont know what to do, so they lay down and wait for another car to drive by.

        • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Progressive idealism is all well and good, but without acknowledging the realities of a highly polarized world and the balances of power in play all it will ever be is idealism, never realized fact.

          Many of the broader growths in society didn’t have a defining ‘flip the switch’ moment and instead where the result of small changes that then where the building blocks to bigger ones after the smaller steps where accepted as normal parts of society.

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          The problem is that this is potentially the only positive change they could make in people’s lives that might actually make money, so once they’ve done it, there’s nothing else that lines up with both the interests of the party and their voters. Even prison reform as a whole might be a net loss in spite of the current system’s incredible cost to taxpayers due to the chilling effect it has on social mobility and the slave labor that the bourgeoisie can profit off of.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            We can’t do the only easy thing we can do because then we won’t have any easy things we can promise to do that we just won’t!!!

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I grew up straight edge in a religious household. I was so afraid of getting into trouble, I didn’t even drink as a teenager even though all my friends did.

    Now my work depends on me keeping away from illegal drugs. Seeing as my family’s livelihood depends on that, it’s a pretty straightforward decision to never cross that line, ever. So I say this as a 30+ yr old who’s rarely drank and never done drugs of any kind that weren’t prescribed.

    If this changes, and it’s confirmed that my livelihood wouldn’t be threatened for trying it, I would absolutely partake.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    As quickly as possible…now that we’ve done nothing about it for nearly four years, but we have to win another election soon.