SociallyIneptWeeb

Yes.

Okay, like two/thirds of this post are just fucking brain-dead. (Not an American btw.)

Afghanistan and Gulf War were the most straightforward of all conflicts US has been involved in in the 21st century.

Afghanistan - that’s where the Taliban were, and the Taliban did 9/11 (kinda, Al Qaeda did, but they had ties, and bin Laden was there for a time). The only problem was that the US didn’t consider the regional politics and allied with Pakistan, which was funding the Taliban, since stable Afghanistan was bad for Pakistan.

Gulf War - he, y’know, INVADED KUWAIT! What the fuck is so difficult to understand about “Invading sovereign states is bad actually”!?

Iraq War was bad though 100%

IDF should stop claiming civilian infrastructure is hiding Hamas terrorists.

And instead use it’s intelligence to locate them.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha…

You serious?

For real though. Yes the CEO can get a pay cut, but that is unlikely to save more than a few individuals. The costs of labour are just that high, often the highest of all costs a company has. That’s why laying off staff, although terrible, is the best way to save money for a company.

I agree that CEOs earn waaaaay to much for what they actually do, but cutting that is not the magic solution people imagine it is.

Even the famous pay cut by Shigeru Miyamoto of Nintendo was accompanied by other cost saving measures in the company, and only because Japanese law demands that layoffs be the last thing a company does.