Concern: Starlink will ruin science.
Rebuttal/joke : But… I want memes.
Concern: Starlink will ruin science.
Rebuttal/joke : But… I want memes.
What are you talking about? I replied to the post because it belonged as a top comment. Because it’s a response to the article, not a person’s comment.
And this isn’t simply because it’s a different topic, it’s an edgy, snide “answer” which is not an answer, that’s the point.
… You’re comparing a kitchen (sanitary) to a bomb exploding? Gloves will not protect you from a bomb. Anything that would would be far too large and unwieldly to use when trying to diffuse a bomb.
But… memes.
Left hand, I wonder if they’re trained to use their non dominant hand. Though he should tuck his right hand away too.
Gloves are useless, and you need fine motor control anyway.
Glove 80 keyboard:
There’s also a wide world of alt letter layouts.
Sounds like I want to know the cause of the lockdowns (you know, the news), not an edgy response.
Only speech.
Threats against the VP are very illegal. He’s trying the stupid age old trick “someone else would be a hero” routine. To which I say the FBI showing up and saying that’s not ok is fine by me. Don’t know if they have to give him a warning or what.
“Because algorithms will use it against you.” It didn’t say google.
Ok this was an article about a prison being locked down. I asked what is the reason for this specific lockdown.
Do you have backup that POC and slave labor is the reason for this specific lockdown? If you do, then show it. If not, then it’s just being 14 and edgy. Yes there are many issues with prisons, but yelling about different things as an answer for this specific lockdown is practically the very definition of being edgy. I’m trying to discuss one thing, and then someone comes yelling about a different thing. It’s like that interrupting bird meme.
Lemmy really needs to get past this “I’m 14 and very edgy” thing.
Results: Coming in shortly.
Any rumors why?
Article just hints that previous shutdowns were because of illegal activity.
Who said I accept nothing? Simply because I lay out what needs to happen, while you live in la la land of “president just needs to want it”. Why am I bothering with your nonsense replies, you need to do some reading. Ciao.
I still want to see, I guess it would be, if you plug from one outlet to another. Do you know?
Other things took simple majority, therefore this would take a simple majority too? Outstanding logic. By that logic no one has every filibustered anything, right? If Dobbs was something the GOP wanted, they would have filibustered it.
lol so thanks for exposing your goal of misinformation. I see no point in continuing to rebut your mental gymnastics, so ciao.
*ACA was passed 60-39, supermajority.
Why did everyone shift to sanitation when this post was about fucking bombs.