what scenario are you imagining where any of meta’s product offerings are useful to me?
what scenario are you imagining where any of meta’s product offerings are useful to me?
tfw your national strategic reserve of facebook posts is depleted
Without technology prepared to counter teleporters
like the shields all the ships in starwars have?
you can’t just decide to build cutting edge chips
if the DoD needed cutting edge chips but had to purchase them from within the US, all that would happen is their technology would be worse for the next decade(s) until US production could catch up
given the current us procurement strategy of keeping at least a generation or so ahead of its next near-peer, i really doubt that would fly
Biden could have had this 30 minute conversation at literally any point over the past several months
in panel 2 what part of his anatomy is that
But either you’d be strategically weakening the country to give invading forces an easier time, at which point you’re throwing civilians into the meat grinder anyway, or you’re starving the country until it devolves into literal anarchy, because the only people in the position to surrender were entrenched enough that they’d be the last one to see their power structure fall apart.
but it’s not the hexbears making these memes…?
the ai:
def is_hamas(target):
return True
a supernova is caused by nuclear fusion
teleporters don’t work through shields
they should just link the display to the steering wheel
to go left and right you steer accordingly
to go up and down you accelerate or break
Please remember, you have as much evidence I am not, as I have that god doesn’t exist.
you’re still behaving as if i’m trying to convince you of the existence of a god, rather than you trying to convince me that one doesn’t exist
do you understand the difference?
the cold war, probably
That’s a loaded question. What type of god? You wanna define it before you ask if it exists.
given that we’re very clearly talking in the context of a christian god here, I’m not sure what additional information you need
but what if i’m god ha ha he he
this is just that edgy teenager shit again
The first part is a response to “why would somebody be sad if their religion turned out to be false”, which for the record, if you need it explained to you why that might be, you’re really earning that “edgy teenager” label.
The second is saying that there’s literally no way to be sure of answers on the scale of “is there a god?”, science included
Philosophy asks some “why?” questions, but if you think it’s equipped to definitively answer all of them you don’t know much about philosophy.
how on earth was that your takeaway from that comment?
neither science nor philosophy can provide objective truth in answer to the question “is there a god?”
it’s edgy teen territory to act like they can
“well if you can’t think of a solution, then ‘full speed towards the ravine’ is clearly the logical choice”
this might count as destroying evidence