So you are saying…nothing?? Just making noise to sounds smart, are you?
Whatever
Edit: if this “level of discourse” is what one can expect from you, yeah, please go away…
So you are saying…nothing?? Just making noise to sounds smart, are you?
Whatever
Edit: if this “level of discourse” is what one can expect from you, yeah, please go away…
No, there are some edits - done in sharpie.
Are you seriously suggesting that procreation means it’s impossible to have unhealthy attitudes toward sex??
What a dumb take.
And yet you have done nothing to promote any alternative; so your faux outrage is, in fact, useless.
I honestly couldn’t care less about middle class. They’re comfortable. I’m not. Therefore, they don’t need help…
Didn’t remove paywall for me… (Not complaining, just pointing out that they may have found a way around this method, which sux.)
I’m not gonna teach my daughters who they are or are not supposed to trust. Because I will never teach my children what they should think, but rather how to think for themselves. I will encourage them to only trust individuals that prove themselves trustworthy, but again, that’s not my decision to make.
They’re not extensions of me; they are distinct, individual human beings. So I certainly hope you will not teach her to be distrustful; that leads to misery and pain, all in the pursuit of something that doesn’t belong to you and never will (her mind is her own, whether you like it or not).
Yup, those darn Democrats and their facts! How dare they have evidence to back up their claims?!
Orange weirdo never had the support of the people, and his entire time in office was not only illegitimate, it’s downright embarrassing.
I personally would only use the original phrase to imply what you’re saying. This is why context matters so much I think; some people just use it as a thought terminating cliche, I’m afraid.
First one is saying there’s no point fixing anything, just get over it. Second one saying fixing it might suck, let’s fix it anyway.
Very, very different…
Your face is weird. Like, really.
Umm…what??? Lol
So you’re saying the statistically less likely option is the one you think is most likely to have been the case?
Not only is this kind of view dangerous and prejudiced, it is quite simply not supported by the data.
Umm, I have no clue what you’re trying to say. I know what happened, I read the stupid article.
What a weird argument for you to make, though, being that it’s entirely irrelevant. And, you know, weird.
Press X to doubt…🙄
Oh, that’s right. I forgot that being called “weird” is, like, the worst thing you can say about someone.
Wait no, I think your statement is weird…
No. You just think a bully is amusing. Some of us don’t.
Huh, didn’t realize that. I understand a lot of the physical servers for those kinda companies are in the upper Midwest, but I never thought about where thire HQ is at; you make some excellent points.
There is definitely a fight brewing over who has final say in regards to what happens on the Internet. Gonna be interesting seeing how this plays out.
The difference is, I think, just how much of the content or there is hosted in America. If they succeed in forcing local companies to follow some new draconian measure, it’ll likely have a disproportionately high effect on non-US traffic.
So, what’s your point?
Any of this change the innocence of the person they shot in the head??