Remember that a definition is not an endorsement of a word’s use.
Remember that a definition is not an endorsement of a word’s use.
I got paid minimum wage when I was a supermarket cashier.
I’ve always used it as an example of when oversimplified chalkboard economics don’t match experimental reality.
Literally everyone who uses that word sucks
Confirmed my guess
No I value their opinion
Your client can ban specific users for you only, and you can block individual communities if you don’t like their moderation.
But I’m guessing they embarrassed you a year ago and you actually want them banned from the internet.
Ok then same question but without “of the political compass”
Even if he’s legal, I saw him eating cats.
Every normal person is on several lists now regardless of guilt. We just consider that a reasonable search and treat Snowden like a traitor.
Eat the rich! Time for the guillotines.
That sounds awesome and I’d love to use it.
Back to 1.0, Javascript is pollution
Alternate reality: Schwarzenegger wins 2016 election, by 2024 we have M4A and nationwide high-speed rail.
These guys are always painfully blind to the defense budgets they support.
They’re calling all sheriffs fascist
Does anyone here believe that these are equivalent, and that both of your statements are true?
What follows is incorrect
It’s a price floor, which creates a deadweight loss.
Since we’re also consumers, it’s a net loss.