Just like last time, everyone stopped reading a while ago, including me.

This is a semantic matter. No socialist state has ever claimed to have reached the stage of communism, including China. But some socialist states—including China—have been/are run by communist governments/parties, which claim to be working toward reaching that stage.

Has Russia broken international law with an illegal invasion of Ukraine?

Why are you unable to answer a simple yes or no question put to you a dozen times?

It’s not that I’m unable—as I have already answered—it’s that I choose not to restate it in the format you demand, no matter how many times you nag me. You’re just making a fool of yourself with this harassment.

Correct. Lemmy has as many Russian trolls as it has NAFO trolls: approximately zero.

“Troll” does not mean, “anyone who disagrees with me,” and “Russian troll” does not mean anyone “anyone who disagrees with me with respect to the Ukraine proxy war.”

I’m starting to think you’re hoping that, by being rude & annoying enough, someone will ban you, so you can then blame Russian trolls! Russian trolls! Russian trolls! Or maybe you’re just like this.

$ curl -s 'https://lemmy.ml/api/v3/modlog?limit=50&other_person_id=8274625' \
> | jq 'pick(.removed_comments, .banned_from_community, .banned, .removed_posts) | keys[] as $k | .[$k] | length' \
> | paste -s -d+ - | bc
43
$

That’s not it works. Vegetarians aren’t following in Hitler’s footsteps. If two people were to have similar stances on something, they didn’t necessarily come to it in the same way, or one from the other. In fact, they don’t even necessarily hold similar stances for similar reasons.

That you don’t think Russia broke international law by invading Ukraine.

I said no such thing.

Remember when you kept threatening me that you’re gonna ban me off of a whole instance because I downvoted a comment of yours?

That’s not what happened, either.

Oh… it’s my stalker again.

It’s a bit of a stretch to say I’m pro-Russian, and why would I care what Trump says or thinks? He’s a clown who bullshits and contradicts himself all the time.

To characterize a communist state and an anticommunist state as “allies” is absurd. Two states can’t be more at odds with each other than that.

Soviets trained Nazi tank and artillery crew and provided them place for military training

That all ended before or just as the Nazis seized control the German state. So no, they didn’t train Nazis, because the military wasn’t a Nazi one yet.

You forget that Germans were allies of Soviet Union in the beginning.

What? No. Is this more Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact nonsene? If the USSR and Germany were allies because of a non-aggression pact, then so were many other Allied states allies of Germany. The USSR signed that pact to buy itself time to build up their war capacity, knowing that Germany was likely to eventually try to invade. The Nazis came to power as virulent anticommunists, as fascists always are, because fascist movements are always funded by the capitalist class.

Is this photo supposed to mean something to someone? Because it doesn’t mean anything to me or TinEye. No idea who that guy is.

Please, tell us more about your Uyghur friends and their imprisoned parents.

What’s it like to completely make stuff up and post it online pseudonymously?

Did you get here from the ’90s in a time machine?

You really need to stop denying genocide.

I won’t, but I’ll try to refrain from commenting on it in your communities. (And yes, I’m familiar with the Convention’s definition of genocide and have taken it into account.)

Everyone Who Disagrees With Me Is a Bot

Reason: misinfo/trolling

Sorry, but calling someone out on their strawmaning is misinfo/trolling, apparently. I don’t make the rules 🤷

No. The only person who brought them up was you, and for some reason you’re still doing it.

Is this some attempt at, “Have you stopped beating your wife?”

It was the United States that blocked that UN visit: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-usa-rights/u-s-germany-slam-china-at-u-n-security-council-over-xinjiang-diplomats-idUSKCN1TX2YZ/

Last month the United States, Britain and other western countries objected to a visit by the United Nations counterterrorism chief to Xinjiang, concerned the visit would validate China’s argument that it was tackling terrorism.

Delegates from Muslim countries did visit. From the US’ own propaganda outlet: Arab League Visits China’s Xinjiang Region, Rejects Uyghur Genocide

If your argument were rational and logical then the genocide in Gaza isn’t happening either.

Speaking of rationality & logic, that sentence is sheer nonsense.

I mean, I could make the exact same garbage argument about you denying the Canadian genocide of the Flemish, which I just made up. Myanmar & Sudan aren’t even germane to the issue, so what’s the point of this diversion?