Overt, disgusting racism is what his voters support, so it is a good distraction if there was news about something they don’t support. They support everything, as long as it is evil, though, so do not ask me what that could be.
Overt, disgusting racism is what his voters support, so it is a good distraction if there was news about something they don’t support. They support everything, as long as it is evil, though, so do not ask me what that could be.
A nutjob conservative on Lemmy has been telling me that babies are being executed in post-birth abortions using these same tactics.
This is dumb and odor shouldn’t be anyone’s last straw with Donald, but I’ll take whatever we can get.
You have to at least agree that this one seems to be backed by evidence, and differs from Alex Jones’s bullshit on at least that.
Age dementia and syphilis dementia combo. This geriatric needs terminal care. He is physically and mentally unfit for the job.
“Objective” and “fair” is when reading facts doesn’t hurt their feelings by correctly stating that the entire Republican party is rotten with bigotry and is actively working on dismantling the government so the wealthy can rule without nasty obstructions like environmental laws.
Regressives are racist, though. They specifically chose to be racist theocrats as part of Southern Strategy. They ran a racist who said Mexicans are rapists and thieves (ironically he is a rapist and a thief). They are currently running a racist who is saying Haitian people are stealing pets and eating them.
“This article is too biased because it correctly presents the racist nationalism party as participating in racist nationalism.”
The admission is what sets him apart from Donald. I don’t know why other Repubs are unable to just double down on a lie the way Donald is. They have seen how effective it is with their dimwitted voters, what’s the incentive to own up? Just draw the hurricane path you want with Sharpie.
It is extremely concerning, and it is not just this. They have been talking about mass deportations all year.
It’s a “coup” and “illegal” to replace him on the ballot. People are saying.
That’s superstitious, don’t be silly… Anyway let’s organize a Repub conference there as a send off, it is the right thing to do.
Anyone who promised to remove that regulation would get most libertarians and a good chunk of Repubs to vote for them.
He doesn’t seem embarrassed but he should be.
If not even Libertarians will abide by the Non-Aggression Pact why do they think that’s a solution to anything?
Melania always looks like she has been sucking on lemons, but she’s probably fine with it? She doesn’t have to touch him and her prenup keeps her finances safe.
Shouldn’t you do something implausible with zero evidence to match it? Or do you think it’s just impossible that he would have since she doesn’t look like Ivanka?
Apologies, in my previous comment I hadn’t read clearly enough and misunderstood. I have deleted it.
IMO, it’s not the full story to say the Republican party was a third party that year. The previous opposition to the Democrats had a rift and came apart. I think you are underselling what “the right conditions” are. This is more like a new party filling a void.
That year the Democrats themselves (regressives as this was well before Southern Strategy) split into two. Running both a candidate for “states’ rights” style slavery and another for “fuck you, slavery everywhere” style slavery.
FPTP is not real democracy for this reason.
How much of that is because the same racists focused on “replacement” decided that they will judge children using the same “one drop” bullshit they have always used so they can exclude more people from “whiteness?”