It is interesting how easily the article passes off ‘stacking courts’ as more of a danger with elections than appointments.

Nneeeeiiigh.

Haspil resigned a year later but continued to steal money, even after Saleh discovered the theft and let Haspil repay him over two years to avoid criminal prosecution.

Well that didn’t work out.

Unfortunately this person did not have a western sounding name so there’s going to be even less attention than Rachel’s murder received.

Saudi wasn’t investing billions in a social media platform.

Saudi was spending billions to have a social media platform killed.

A few wooden stakes, a roll of chicken wire, an AR-15, and an overwatching IDF sniper or armored vehicle. That’s your settler starter pack.

After the Super Nintendo came out, it really did become a term for differentiating which ‘Nintendo’ you might’ve had in the 90s.

Eventually you get to “Maybe next holiday.” Which turns into “Maybe next vacation.”

And then you realize you’re burning PTO on various crisises than a vacation will never come.

So that’s developing into “Maybe if I am lucky to retire…”

They’re the same thing.

Big, if true.

It is really quite something how Obama almost categorically opted to give up without a fight on virtually every issue. He had to be dragged across the finish line for the ACA and was trying to kill the public option before Lieberman even took that charge up.

The backroom politics of the Obama years should have primed anyone for what came after.

Is a ‘massive strike’ bigger or smaller than a ‘large-scale attack’?

I see this sentiment a whole lot. Unless you were like, one of the few thousand people in a swing district in a swing state, that vote, for/against/thirdparty/nonvote likely had zero impact. Tens of millions of voters have their votes dumpstered because of thr electoral college. California Trump voters and Tennessee Democrats, alike.

Unless you know your vote would’ve swung your district and also your state, do not sweat having put faith in a camp. Besides it is about policy, not people or party.

If someone is focused on people or party at the expense of any policy? You’re probably not dealing with strong leftist sentiment to begin with.

A kinder, gentler mass deportation and border militarization is pretty on point with the bipartisan border plan being touted.

Castle of the Winds

Now that’s a game name I haven’t heard or thought of in probably 30 years. Damn. I may have to spend my weekend on that now.

I think it depends on your definition of ‘okay thing to do.’ If you’ve never used it and only became aware of it once it failed: it has been functionally a fancy cap with extra parts. You can probably cap it without consequence.

They use ‘loaded words’ so they are ‘mixed’!

It probably aligns with the kind of thinking that can assume the MIC produces only defense and protection: under certain parameters they’re right but under others it can be quite naive.

I was happy to ignore it until the threads about it came up and the people/person running the bot demonstrated they weren’t really going to listen to negative feedback. MBFC isn’t accurate on political bias, but it is accurate on reporting whether a source is well known/reliable. The bot maker doesn’t seem to care much about that. That’s probably why people prefer to downvote it so much now.

And, uh, I wouldn’t read any of my text here in ‘upset’. That’s just being silly.

When a venture capital enterprise founded on incorporating AI into the news injects itself into every thread people are going to have a problem and not just to block or ignore.