I don’t know if I have ever witnessed a more useless bot.

Costco is the other location that we so most of our shipping at and I agree.

We shop at Aldi a lot and, anecdotally, they seem to be the most reasonably priced by a pretty hefty margin.

In less than 24 hours nearly 400k Americans registered to vote using the specific link that she provided. That’s the number that matters. If they actually go vote that is enormous.

So, having actually watched the interviews with these people, I’m pretty comfortable saying the younger woman is not a Trump supporter. She seemed to maybe not be the most intelligent person, but that’s not a super fair assessment from a few brief Q&As. She was becoming visibly upset by some of his rhetoric, abortion related in particular.

I also wouldn’t be surprised if they were led to an answer of “we’re still undecided” by the interviewers in conclusion to broadcast a non-partisan appearance.

The younger woman absolutely was not. The third guy seemed like a toss up for me. I would bet he self-identities as “libertarian”.

I guarantee that woman has been registered R her entire life, sees why he is problematic on a very superficial level, and is still going to AT BEST abstain from voting but more likely vote for him anyhow.

Socks don’t move of their own accord.

He’s literally trolling. Chaos in the West in any form only benefits Putin.

Yeah this just feels like government approved passive aggression.

Maybe just leave these indigenous peoples alone?

I know nothing about game development, so feel free to reference back to that. If the player is controlling an actual toddler in this game, rather than a 2ft tall Ethan Winters, have you considered trying to alter the camera and movement controls so they are more wobbly/unsteady? The most jarring observation I had from the trailer was "No toddler on the planet moves that purposefully.

Otherwise I think you have a fantastic spooky atmosphere and I think the idea of playing a helpless child really lends itself to the horror genre in a powerful way.

Do you think you could expand on what the gameplay is actually like?

I’m all for the use of ad blockers but I really hope that statement was intended to be ridiculous.

Your dismissal of his credibility as a source doesn’t make you any less wrong.

There’s evidence that they’re pursuing a domestic policy somewhat similar to the US response to 9/11

Lmao at what point did the United States government detain and imprison and torture millions of people in response to 9/11?

You’re awfully dismissive of a horrific situation just to stand on top of the ethical fallacy that this isn’t “genocide” as it fits your definition.

Several countries, including the US, UK, Canada and the Netherlands, have accused China of committing genocide - defined by international convention as the “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.

The declarations follow reports that, as well as interning Uyghurs in camps, China has been forcibly mass sterilising Uyghur women to suppress the population, separating children from their families, and attempting to break the cultural traditions of the group.

The US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, has said China is committing “genocide and crimes against humanity”.

The UK parliament declared in April 2021 that China was committing a genocide in Xinjiang.

A UN human rights committee in 2018 said it had credible reports that China was holding up to a million people in “counter-extremism centres” in Xinjiang.

The only one comparing the two is you. Both can fit the definition of genocide and be horrific without devaluing the other.

Guess I don’t know how to format quotes properly.

I can’t tell if this is just a silly joke or an astute observation of depression.

Are the Xinjiang papers not enough evidence?

Maybe you would like to follow up on the findings of the select committee investigating the issue?

Maybe you want something Sourced by the BBC?

Don’t be a simp for the CCP. It’s embarrassing.

It sounds like you’re describing the consequences of FOMO rather than the ruination of an industry.all of these issues can be circumvented by simply not participating.

Who looks more ridiculous? The monkey that paid a stupid amount of money for a delicious treat they couldn’t have gotten at home, or the monkey that paid a stupid amount of money for someone else to peel a regular ass banana for them? It’s a pretty basic “don’t throw stones in glass houses” analogy.