Satire and parody are the only legitimate uses of AI
…text to speech, dictation apps, translation systems, enemies in video games, chess bots, cancer discovery, image, video and file compression, cluster algorithms, CGI, world generation, etc.?!
That statement is just ridiculous
if the majority of content ends up being AI generated
yeah…
The majority of the internet is porn. Literally. That doesn’t mean that every information you look up is porn. Just because there exist much of it doesn’t mean wikipedia and other credible sites will suddenly just disappear.
And honestly, while AI generated articles are absolute garbage, it’s not like LLMs you can chat with are completely useless.
by opening videos you don’t like and give them a thumbs down
You don’t need to do this. There literally is a feature for exactly this: Click on the three dots and on “Don’t recommend”. If you do this, content like that won’t be recommended to you anymore.
That song in particular is a song I’ve heard of before, it was one of the first AI generated songs I found (and was sent around a bit because it was an early example of what ridiculous stuff one can do with AI).
You can also hear it to be honest, if you listen closely to the vocals. (Luckily you can still spot AI songs that way, I wonder how long that’ll work.)
Also I looked up obscurest vinyl, and apparently all their songs are AI generated.
You can just click on the three dots and on “Do not recommend” or Don’t recommend from this channel, then it will stop.
Honestly, it sounds very much like the text completion of GPT-3. Unlike ChatGPT, that has a very typical unnecessarily-professionally “sound” and is very trimmed to not do many things, the “raw” auto completion models (at least the older ones like GPT-3) could auto-fill basically anything in a fitting style.
I’ve experimented with the GPT-3 playground a lot before ChatGPT came out and it sounds really plausible to me.
Yes, but Nixon was before Reagan
Nixon started the War on Drugs, not Reagan
Howie Hawkins was nice though (doesn’t mean I would have voted for him)
Ohhhhh wow, that looks really amazing! :O
Are you implying people on OnlyFans aren’t good people?!
because all available history and information basically assured that it was
That’s actually just not true. It’s pretty interesting, but the main reason incumbents have such a high chance of re-election is because exactly this happened with most incumbents that had a low chance already: They got cut out by the party. So there has always been natural cherry-picking that only the “good” incumbents went on to actually be the nominee again (and therefore had a disproportionally high rate of winning).
Although I originally also thought otherwise, when looking at all the data, this was the rational & correct choice.
The green part is written by GTP-3. So the “regular pit supervisor” etc. in the ending got written by a human after the AI generated the first green part, but the last joke was made by AI again.
Just liking something that’s the most popular thing doesn’t mean that you can’t still really appreciate it and be in that subculture
I don’t get it?
I wheezed when he said that
Maybe it’s not that the neighbours are awful but that the subset of neighbours that use this kind of app is mostly awful.
This is a statement from an AMA by the creator: