Hildegarde

Mods, please remove comments like this…

As the winner of Time Magazine’s person of the year in 2006, I disagree.

To translate further:

BEV - self explanatory never mind

NGDV - Oshkosh Next Generation Delivery Vehicle, The new mail truck that looks like a duck

LLV - The Grumman Long Life Vehicle, the classic mail truck.

and as a bonus

FFV - The Ford-Utilimaster Flexible Fuel Vehicle, the early 2000s mail truck that looks like the LLV that you buy from wish.

It is designed to be gas or electric. The few with gas engines will need the ventilation. Also it does have A/C. That is also why it has an engine bay despite being electric.

Not when the voterbase has common interests.

I don’t know what point you’re trying to make. Yes I think boeing taking am action that ensures a strike and also loses them money for no benefit is not plausible.

Do some cursory reading on the national labor relations act.

You keep saying there’s tons of evidence, yet provided none.

Find me one time an american company unilaterally decreaced the pay of a union contract during its term.

If that was common, we would’t negotiate multi-year agreements.

In fact, it would be far easier for them to do that after the contract expires, and a 1 year contract term would give them many more opportunities.

Healthcare isn’t something that only the unfortunate need. Healthcare is something every person needs. If you live long enough, it will be costly. This is why insurance as a concept is fundamentally unable to handle healthcare. It is antithetical to the concept of insurance.

This has been solved by modern technology.

Mirrors in the olden days were made with silver, and because silver is the good pure metal it refuses to reflect the evil vampires, hence the lack of reflection.

Modern mirrors lack silver so they will reflect vampires just like everyone else!

Yes, companies are corrupt. However, the way you described it cannot happen. Boeing is smart enough to not try to fuck over workers in a way that they are guaranteed to lose and all but ensures an immediate strike.

Even after the contract expires, they have to continue paying at the previous rate. If boeing wanted to pull something they would be smart enough to do it in a more subtle and effective way.

You’re wasting everyone’s time by making up problems with a contract. Multi year contracts are standard. There may be a lot wrong with the contract, but the fact that its a multi year contract like every normal union contract isn’t one of them.

No one who negotiates union contracts is worried that an employer might randomly decide to revert a negotiated payscale.

Two delta planes collided on the tarmac, but they call the smaller plane an endavor plane so they can pay the pilots less.

your hypothetical shows a complete lack of understanding.

if they do these things all the time as you say, you would have a real example rather than a purely hypothetical one.

your delusional fantasy is not reality

Boeing didn’t propose this contract unilaterally. It was a negotiation. They think this is the minimum raise that the workers will agree to.

Most of what you have said is wrong.

It is a four year contract. The parties negotiated the rates for the next four years, once the contract is ratified it is binding. Boeing will be required to pay according to the wage scale. Its not boeing’s word, its a contract and the union has remidies if boeing violates the terms if the contract. This is how most union contracts work. Wage changes are spread out over the term of the contract. This is normal.

Also the raise is not 6.25% per year. That’s not how percentages work. The average would be 5.8% as annual percentage raises are cumulative. If they negotiated a 6.25% annual raise they would have a 27% raise over the term of the contract.

It is deliberately misleading to report raises for the life of the contract. It makes the win sound better in the headline than it is.

Read the description for the sentry. It gives you a hint on how to overcome it, while also confirming it’s invulnerability.

Try to discover yourself! But if you need more help:

I hate this.

All the doors slow down before latching, perfectly smoothly easing into a stop, the way your animation software interpolates keyframes.

Real latches need momentum to latch, it takes energy from the door to push the latching bolt. The door will slow when pushing the mechanism, but slam slightly with the leftover energy. The motion is the thing that looks most fake about this animation.

So… neither?

ur a disc

Depends on how you store data on it. If you write with a pen its optical.