That’s a lot of things to infer off of just scrolling past a 512×768 JPEG. If the image was in another context and the text had been different, no one would have batted an eye.
That’s a lot of things to infer off of just scrolling past a 512×768 JPEG. If the image was in another context and the text had been different, no one would have batted an eye.
That isn’t extremely obvious though, especially with the JPEG compression. If you didn’t know to look, you wouldn’t have noticed it. No one scrutinizes Jeopardy text.
Yeah, but the point isn’t to look like a legit Jeopardy clue, it just has to not look generated. You can respect the height limit if you want, or break it.
Your reply also wasn’t in the form of a question. No points.
I think something innocuous or inoffensive enough to most people qualify as “good looking”. I mean, that’s how marketing works.
A generated image could be so good you’d never be able to tell. Like this one:
I think the real complaint here is about bad looking art. Not a lot of people have an eye for picking out good-looking images. Or this person is just a huge snob.
Why do you have it?
Or just not show people what you’re typing.
That whole page is full of wild shit.
I can’t tell if this is a joke or not.
A computer like that is useful outside of work. I’d pay for it out of pocket if I had to.
Page returns 404 for me.
They were making toys before trying out video games.
If you’re on Windows, you should return it before it’s too late. It isn’t going to get better.
Is one of these cats just large or is this a trick of perspective?
The only thing I got from this is that bro loves ads more than anything in the world.
Excellent.
I wanna believe you, but the JPEG artifacts on an image that small make it extremely difficult to even notice the distortions you’re referring to, especially at a glance. You’ve made it obvious you’re replying in bad faith, so I’m gonna leave it here. Have a good one.