A North Texas man has filed a class action lawsuit against Cinemark, claiming the movie theater chain is lying to customers about the size of its drinks.

Shane Waldrop claims that Cinemark’s 24 ounce cups can only hold 22 ounces of liquid, according to the lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

  • Bell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    240
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Waldrop took the empty container home and measured how much it could hold, discovering it only held 22 ounces.

    I love this guy, totally something I would do

  • streetfestival@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Shrinkflation noobs. Never specify the size of a (pseudo-)prepared product. It’s better to use abstract terms like large, extra large, and jumbo that can be shrunk down in size without increasing legal liability down whenever you wish to juice your profits a bit (/s)

  • LoudWaterHombre@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    North Texas man sues Cinemark claiming 24-ounce beer cups can’t hold 24 ounces

    Published April 19, 2024 2:56pm CDT

    A North Texas man has filed a class action lawsuit against Cinemark, claiming the movie theater chain is lying to customers about the size of its drinks.

    Shane Waldrop claims that Cinemark’s 24 ounce cups can only hold 22 ounces of liquid, according to the lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

    On Feb. 14, Waldrop went to the Cinemark in Grapevine and purchased the 20 ounce and 24 ounce draft beer.

    He noticed the 24 ounce cup did not appear to be big enough to hold 4 more ounces of liquid.

    Waldrop took the empty container home and measured how much it could hold, discovering it only held 22 ounces.

    The cup was marked as a 24 oz cup.

    Waldrop and his legal team says the movie theater chain is taking part in “deceptive” and “otherwise improper” business practices that violate state and federal laws about misbranding.

    “This is especially misleading because the 24 oz drink should provide a deal for consumers over the 20 oz drink’s price: $0.37 per ounce vs. $0.39 per ounce. But due to the actual volume of 22 oz available in the ‘24 oz’ drink, the price is $0.40 per ounce making the larger drink more expensive per ounce, which is not a deal at all,” reads the lawsuit.

    The lawsuit says Waldrop brought the suit for himself and “all other persons nationwide.”

    He is seeking a jury trial.

    • Richie Rich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, exactly, they don’t want EU citizens lurking at there websites. You should use a VPN.

      • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s probably just because they didn’t want to bother becoming GDPR compliant and instead blocked everyone that would have that requirement. Curious if they did anything for California though, since they have similar legislation.

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I doesn’t operate in Europe, so they don’t care to be GDPR compliant. They do operate in California, so they need to support those laws. It’s still not worth it to look at changing their policy towards GDPR even if they’re complaint.

    • DBT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is common at theaters that serve food inside the theater. It’s a restaurant movie theater.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Might be most in terms of land area and distribution. It’s definitely not the most in terms of the number of patrons. Both coasts allow beer sales in movie theaters, at least CA, NY, and FL all do, and clearly TX does. That’s 1/3-1/4 of the country (roughly 100 million people) just in those four states.

      • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It only became legal in New York in 2022. Perhaps today most people in the US do live in states where it is legal, but that doesn’t mean they live near a theater that actually does it. This article from a year ago says the largest chain, AMC, has a bar in the lobby of 300 (of their 593 in the US, according to wikipedia) locations but that some of them don’t let you bring a beer into the theater. The second-largest chain, Regal Cinemas, was only serving alcohol in 80 of their 511 locations as of last year.

  • Deello@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    I thought they just pour a bottle/can in a cup and call it a day. That’s what happened when I bought a buzzball for my wife last week. We weren’t expecting a full cup of buzzball but we weren’t complaining because we still got a full drink. They literally opened and poured it in front of us and tossed the empty container. I don’t remember seeing anything on tap but that could just be my local Cinemark.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    On the one hand, lolz. Classic move theater scam. Love to spend $15 on stale popcorn that’s 30% salt and then another $20 on a drink, after walking in with an $8 movie ticket to see 30 minutes of ads.

    On the other hand, holy fuck dude. Maybe slightly less than half a pitcher of beer is more than enough?