Why did UI’s turn from practical to form over function?

E.g. Office 2003 vs Microsoft 365

Office 2003

It’s easy to remember where everything is with a toolbar and menu bar, which allows access to any option in one click and hold move.

Microsoft 365

Seriously? Big ribbon and massive padding wasting space, as well as the ribbon being clunky to use.

Why did this happen?

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The ribbon is better than menus. They’re even customizable. And lots of non-Microsoft software uses ribbons, too.

    Plus there’s a search function right at the top if you can’t find the option you’re looking for

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yet the menus had a search option and were fully customizable … and didn’t waste so much screen space.

      As a user, I’ve never once thought: “I wish I couldn’t fit so many windows on my screen”, nor “I wish non-working space takes up most of my screen forcing me to buy bigger monitors”

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I have all the stuff I use regularly on the first ribbon. I also run excel with the formula bar 3-lines tall. Common keyboard shortcuts were removed so there’s very little unused clutter

        At work I use a 1920x1200 display and have never once thought “ugh I wish I could see 4 more rows” - but if I did, I’d just collapse the ribbon…

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          I remember when much lower resolution was useful, now that’s a small size. Maybe a core problem is the number of people who maximize a window (see, look how much room there is), rather than trying to have multiple Windows to work together