• gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I mean that only matters for people like us.

    99.99% of the Windows user base doesn’t give the tiniest semblance of a shit about any of that. Hell I run Windows on my gaming pc still and have never had cause to do any of that.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m going to be honest with you, as often as this has been memed and for as long as I have been using Windows on my work computer, I have never once been forced to restart on the spot by an automatic update.

        I’m sure those who have will be quick to reply but at this point I’m 90% confident it’s a loud minority.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I’ve seen an entire factory shut down for hours because two critical Win10 computers tried and failed to update. It’s never an issue until it becomes one.

          Plus a failed update is the whole reason I nuked my C: drive and switched to Manjaro (now running Arch, put down the pitchforks).

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Well, running Windows 10, a consumer user-oriented operating system, to control mission-critical machines is mistake number 1.

            This wouldn’t have happened if they had used Windows Server or something actually designed for that task (like Linux!).

            • rtxn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Neither of those options were available. It was written by a third-party for some old .NET Framework version, and the server and GUI components were written as a single application. Putting it on a server wasn’t an option either because the application’s GUI was constantly used for the management of assembly machines, and other applications were used for monitoring and administrative stuff.

              If you had been there, you’d know why this was a low-priority risk. That place was bleeding from a thousand wounds. At least this had some redundancy, for all it was worth in the end…

              (edit) I actually contributed to that software, even though it’s not open-source! I managed to nail down an issue where loading a project file using one locale would result in a crash, but not in others. The .NET stack trace was printed to an XHR response’s payload and I used that to locate a float.ToString() call where CurrentCulture was passed as the cultureInfo instead of InvariantCulture, so depending on the computer’s locale, it would try to parse CSV data either using a decimal dot or a decimal comma. I mailed this to the maintainer and the fix was released within the month.

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sure Windows gives you warning, but after a while it FORCES you to install, even if for whatever reason that new branch bricks your computer. I had a good 6 months of that where every time my computer got shut off, it would force the update and fail like 40 times before it finally let me revert and use my computer. There was no way to tell it to STOP UPDATING

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, because even once is too many.

          In a corporate, I spent an hour and half every morning waiting for Windows to update. Then my coworker handed me Fedora DVD and I never looked back.

  • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    20 years ago, a friend said “Windows does whatever you don’t tell it not to do”. It is as true now as it was then.

    90% of configuring Windows is disabling shit.

      • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Set-ExecutionPolicy Unrestricted -Scope CurrentUser -Force; ls -Recurse .ps1 | Unblock-File; ."WinDebloatTools.ps1"

        Ugh, you need to use the terminal for the simplest tasks in Windows, it’s so hard, nobody will ever use it, cope Windows users!

        That’s what most people in this thread sound like. But for Linux.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Some sort of hidden, concealed, clandestine internal QoS implementation in Windows. Reserving a portion of network bandwidth for high priority traffic sounds like a good concept, but I don’t like the fact that this is so hidden (I’ve been working with computers for many years and I’ve never heard of it until now), and that the mechanism to determine the priority of a packet is unknown.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I love shitting on Windows as much as anyone, but that is a completely baseless, fictitious accusation. And if not, give me a credible source.

          If anything, I’d keep spyware traffic as low-profile as reasonable in Microsoft’s place.

          • dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I tend to agree.

            Nevertheless, some unknown implementation can have bugs and things can go wrong and there’s nothing you can do about it, short of “rebooting” or d̷o̶w̸s̸i̷n̴g̸ ̴t̶h̸e̷ ̸h̵a̵r̵d̷ ̵d̷r̶i̴v̶e̷ ̵w̶i̴t̸h̷ ̸̞̺͠h̵̺͙̎̍o̸͔͠ͅḻ̷̀̇y̵͚͍̎ ̷͉̅̅w̸͎̔a̷̧̫̒́t̶̼̉̓ę̵̾͗r̶̫͑͑ ̴̣̿͒(̷͙̎a̸̬̺͝͝n̸̞̓̓d̴̬͌̍ ̸͇͕͌͝s̷̡̯̓͝u̸̡̳̇͝b̴̳͜͠s̷͍̘̽ë̵̜q̷̝͐̄ȕ̵̞̐e̷̲̠̐́ń̴̨̙͝t̸̛̬͝l̶̮̔͠y̴͕̪̑͝ ̵̖̆ḃ̴̪̟u̶̢͓͑̌y̵̜̤͌̏i̵̦̋ň̴̨͚̀g̸͓͑ ̴͍̬̽à̶͜ ̴͇͔̓n̴̬͂͜ì̷̢̛̯c̴̤̖̈́e̶̼̫̐̊ ̵̹̏͝f̸̙̀̑r̷̪̩͆͆e̸̤̫͛͋s̷̢̙̏h̷͇͔́ ̸̭̆͝N̷̰͗͛͜V̶͇͒̚M̸̟̍͜ě̷̛̟ ̸̢̞́͝a̷͙͔͒͒n̷̻͇͝d̸̘̥͌̾ ̴̜͓͑p̷̬͑͊ŭ̸̮̏t̸̲̀t̴̡͚̽í̶͎͓̑n̴͕̘̒̈́g̴͓̰̓͝ ̵͓̎a̴̻̼͗ ̷̦̍̈́s̷̥̅̈l̴̝̂e̴̞̅͊ḛ̴̊̅k̷͚̕ ̵̛̼̬͗D̴̻̾̽e̵̙͂̊b̷̝͘ī̵̢͇ą̵̂n̴͖̑ ̶̼̚h̴̼͂͑e̷̲͆̆a̵̡̋d̸̢͔̈l̶͕̍̍e̸̛͕̙̒s̶̞͔̀͠s̸̯͖̕ ̵͍̦̈́̉ ̸̨̨̓i̸̙͖͗̌ņ̶̯̍s̸̡̖͗̇ṯ̷́̒ä̵̦́̎l̶̼̄l̵̨͊̊ ̴̳͑͗ó̵͎̅ǹ̴͈̚ ̷͖͊͝i̷̠͇̊t̷̼̞͒͘)̵͎̤̔͌

          • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Well not spyware per se but over the years they found over and over bugs which are really just highways left open in your system ready to be exploited. But to be honest that’s not limited to windows.

      • sanguinet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not, and in a vacuum I don’t think anyone would mind. It is the fact that it is concealed that is really shitty.

        “It reserves bandwidth for high-priority tasks such as Windows Update over other tasks that compete for internet bandwidth, like streaming a movie”

        As much as I’d like to keep my system up to date (and I really do), if I’m watching a movie then that is my priority. Any task I’m currently using the bandwidth on, should be considered my system’s priority. This is akin to rebooting the computer when it determines it is necessary, with the user having little control to stop it; it’s intend isn’t malicious, and it is meant to protect the user, but all it achieves is upsetting the user and make us find ways around it or turn it off completely.

  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Learning Linux is learning how to use a computer.
    Learning Windows is learning how to avoid big companies will when you want to use your computer.

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean, you don’t HAVE to do any of that stuff in Windows, it’s just helps a bit.

    I’m sure there are plenty of windows horror stories. But almost every Windows computer I’ve had in the last decade, both custom and OEM, has worked pretty well out of the box. And almost every Ubuntu computer I’ve had over the last decade has had problems that weren’t trivial to fix.

    I like Linux, but when people compare these problems like they’re the same just are missing the point.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I am currently dual booting and trying to get feature parity in my Linux install as a reletave newbie.

    So far the largest hurdle I’ve been able to solve was getting my RAID array recognized. That sent me down a rabbit hole.

    To get it working in Linux I needed to:

    • switch from LMDE to Mint proper
    • add a PPA repository
    • install the RAID driver
    • manually edit my grub config file to ignore AHCI
    • run a command to apply the change
    • reboot
    • format the volume

    To get it working in Windows I needed to:

    • format the volume(Windows gave me a popup with a single button to do this on login)
    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’d normally use a software raid implementation these days, and Linux has a number of those. But yeah, dual booting can expose some quirks and filesystems and disk setup in general is one of the most prominent.

    • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      it did warn him to be fair. he had to type out “yes, do as i say”, which is a HUGE red flag. even to me, a farely casual windows user.

      • Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just watched that portion. When he scrolls down to “yes do as I say” you can literally see two lines above it stating it will remove desktop environment.

        Outputs exist for a reason, folks.

        • Heydo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          And that is why Linux isn’t as widely distributed as Windows. Linux is great, if you know what you are doing. But most of the world doesn’t have the time needed to learn Linux well enough to avoid major fuck-ups like this.

          Linux gives you a wall of text when all the user did (at least what they thought they did) is say install this program. The system ask “Are you sure?” And the user is like “Yes, just do it!” I can’t imagine anything on Windows doing that lol.

          I like Linux and I think it’s great, but I can certainly understand why the majority of people are wary of it.

          • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Windows would never show the user a wall of incomprehensible text with serious implications and expect them to just click yes!

            Windows:

            Linus was conditioned by Windows to just click “yes” on everything.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I know instantly how to get the packages I need in Linux but I had to do some research to enable the webcam in Windows 10.

    The idea that one OS is easier than the other is misattributed familiarity.

    • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I discovered yesterday that Windows has a command line package manager in Powershell that can install, uninstall and update basically every software you might ever want to install on a Windows PC.
      winget search ""
      winget list
      winget upgrade

        • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          They pulled a corporate and rewrote an opensource project to embed it into windows

          CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

          Do you really need to license your comments?

          © 2024 Baggins@lemmy.ca - All Rights Reserved

          (Plz don’t sue me for making a derivative work based your comment and violating the license kthxbai)

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I own my own instance. Your “license” is not accepted. Your instance sharing content with mine is an automatic agreement to my instance’s terms.

              1.2 Grant of License: By uploading User Content, you grant Saik0-Lemmy a non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use, copy, distribute, publicly display, and modify your User Content

              See how silly this is? Your license means nothing. It’s just wasted screen space. And nobody is pissed. People are just trying to talk sense to you.

        • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well, it’s under a permissive license, so there is little he can do legally, except maybe sue them for not mentioning the original project, which I’m sure they will add and that will be that eventually.

          • onlinepersona@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s true. A little recognition would’ve been nice and I think that’s all he was asking for. Microsoft had a whole team work on it when they could’ve just given him a job to maintain it.

            CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

      • StantonVitales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The worst part is their excuse for not doing it. They’re under the impression that not enough people care about it, so it’s not worth implementing, and in explaining that they make it sound like it’s some great effort to make taskbar-related context menus pop up from the top instead of the bottom. Literally just having the volume or whatever menu pop up in relation to the top instead of the bottom. It’s the craziest fucking thing I’ve ever seen, especially since like five different free apps and a couple paid ones already have done it. A few hours worth of coding and testing is apparently too expensive time and money-wise for literally Microsoft to bother spending.

        Tali Roth then explains that “when it comes to actually being able to move the taskbar to different locations on the screen, there are a number of challenges with that. When you think about having the taskbar on the right, or the left, all of a sudden the reflow and the work all of the apps have to do to have a wonderful experience is just huge.”
        https://www.howtogeek.com/114501/microsoft-explains-why-you-cant-move-the-windows-11-taskbar/

        A wonderful experience they say. Jesus fucking christ. I haven’t had a “wonderful experience” since Windows 98 and that was largely because I was 12 and didn’t know any better.

          • StantonVitales@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            All Windows sucks balls big time, like I said I was 12 and the only other OS I experienced before that was mac when it was still black and white and whatever the hell was on the apple II

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Unpopular opinion: The Windows Registry, a centralized, strongly typed key:value database for application settings, is actually superior to hundreds of individual dotfiles, each one written in its own janky customized DSL, with its own idea of where it should live in the file system, etc.

      • excitingburp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The language itself has no type enforcement, the type checking is implemented within nixpkgs. This might seem like pedantry, but it really matters for things like LSPs (text editor autocomplete). I think that’s what scares some people off: it’s like OG Minecraft, you need to have the wiki/search.nixos.org open while you are doing your editing.

        That being said, the type checking goes much deeper than what the windows registry does - e.g. it won’t allow you to enable conflicting services - like grub and systemd-boot - at the same time.

  • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Interestingly, I like to keep my network connected devices up to date. Why would I disable that on any OS?

    For me, candy crush et al was never installed on my Windows computers by default, both on home and pro versions. There were install shortcuts, but never the actual programs themselves.

    • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Keeping a Pro or a Home install up to date is not always a good thing. From a security standpoint, yes, I do agree, but when half your personal files go missing after an update… you kinda start wondering why you let this thing update automatically in the first place.

      LTSC editions though, yes. I leave them to autoupdate. They do it like once a month anyway, so it’s not that big of a deal anyway, it’s not really such a big problem. And the updates don’t take that long, no new features are added, just security updates and that’s it.

      So, if you’re worried about security and being up to date, I’d recommend the Windows LTSC editions. That is the only thing I ever install if I have to install Windows.

      • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I haven’t experienced the missing files issue on any of the machines I use, nor have the people I know. I guess the missing files thing is when some people set up their directories in a specific unusual way.

        On a couple of machines my personal directories are in the default locations and on one machine there on a separate drive.

          • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Apparently the files were never deleted. The issue was something failed with a temp profile during the update process for some users. I don’t care enough to read on it further. That’s good enough in my opinion and not a reason to avoid Windows.

  • Veticia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Windows: Cannot print because error.

    User: What error?

    Windows: What error?