• the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    What the fuck is this article smokin? Is it AI?

    …of these young kids,

    Ok goddamnit, enough with the millennials r kids n shit. Im 45. Millennials are adults. Adults! Kiss my pucker, fucker

  • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can confirm. I’m 38 and I cringe every time I see a remake of some 20 or 30 year old movie or show. Come up with something original instead of going for the low hanging fruit. Also, use less CGI and more practical effects.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Too much bad cgi now days.

      Look at top gun 2. I wasn’t excited at all to see it. I left the theater pumped and saw it four more times.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I thought I was going to hate it. It seemed like a cash grab. I’m not a huge fan on Tom cruise. It was just a damn good movie. Movies have forgot they’re supposed to be entertaining. It was entertaining.

        • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          But also a ton of practical effects. The CGI was mostly there to help the practical effects, the movie wasn’t full on CGI like Avatar.

  • trebuchet@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Seems like one of those things everyone would say in the abstract, particularly on a survey. Then when the studios go for safe projects and the thing they remake is among someone’s personal favorites they’ll watch it anyway, validating the strategy.

  • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Say it to a survey but then when the movies come out the dollars come in for the remakes and reboots

    Kind of like 90% of Americans disapproving of Congress but then votes for their incumbents.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s also the financial risk to be considered. A mainstream film release from 1970 might have been produced by fifty people, cast and crew combined. The crew for Barbie as per the image above was close to a thousand people. That’s expensive. Have to put in twenty times the ante to be in the game, and all the payoff is in established properties that you already know have an audience? It would be foolish to do otherwise.

      Like you say, if people actual did what they said they wanted, and go and take a punt on the new stuff rather than going to watch the same-old, then it would be different. But you can’t complain about it when that’s what you spend your money on.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    *Looks at Millenials and Gen-Z queuing round the block for the latest mediocre Marvel horseshit*

    You can say you want one thing, but you’ll cheerfully pay for whatever the adverts in your tiktoks tell you to buy.

    • formergijoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Oh come now. If Halo had to stick to pre-existing lore we wouldn’t have seen Master Chief’s ass.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        When you make 9 hours of video, but the only redeeming portion of it is 3 seconds of ass.

  • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Here’s what people want… Good movies and good television. Yeah, originality is great, but remakes can be good too.

    I liked the remake of Infernal Affairs (The Departed), Scarface, Cape Fear, Ocean’s 11, The Fly, King Kong (Peter Jackson), True Grit, Judge Dread, and The Wizard of Oz (1939) was also a remake. The Fall Guy looks good too.

    For TV, there’s Battlestar Galactica, Westworld, Cobra Kai, Sabrina, and Wednesday, though different, could fit in there as it’s still based on another property.

    What people don’t want are obvious cash grabs.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hell some of those remarks are better than the original IMO the True Grit remake is infinitely better than the original one, mind you I dont like John Wayne movies and this aint even me being political I fucken love Clint Eastwood movies.

      • Lesrid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think it’s funny you use Clint Eastwood to prove you’re not politically motivated because he talked to a chair to entertain conservatives while John Wayne on the other hand was a Nazi. Like I get it, you can absolutely disagree with both it’s just funny the difference in egregiousness.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wonder how many times in my life I will get to see Batman’s parents die? Or James bond play poker? Or star wars get ruined?

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    In terms of movies the worst offenders are remakes of foreign films for the US audience. Like the Oldboy remake was completely unnecessary and it changed key parts of the story. Funny Games was just a shot-for-shot remake of the original one!

    Personally I’m finding the video game remakes even more egregious than the movie/tv remakes. I think it’s a side effect of the modern day development costs being so out of control but as long as people keep doube - and triple - dipping on games this is going to continue.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      “The Girl with the dragon tattoo” and “a man called Otto” are both good remakes.

      So I don’t agree at all. A remake isn’t bad in itself.

  • Dra@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Movie studios pay unimaginable money to learn what people want. It is a constant, year round expenditure for them. Their information and data suggests that while a vocal minority may be fed up with remakes, people still fervently buy them, have very short memories and seem to go bananas for any shred of nostalgia bait.

    Remakes are as a result an incredibly safe bet, they are less expensive and less risk, which in financial terms is a green light. Until they aren’t either of those things and they carry more risk, they will continue to be pedalled out.

    • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you ask people what they want it makes sense you’ll get a lot a sequels.

      Like if you asked people what they wanted 200 years ago they would say faster horses, not a car.

    • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      False. They pay unimaginable money to find out the least amount of money required to make the most profit. Which means reducing risks on unknown properties, repeating trends that have been successful. So original stories represent unknown risk even if it’s something the public wants.

    • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Boomers. Same reason why they’d much rather go to concerts for halfway decent cover bands of their childhood favorites than put any effort into discovering new music